Two new ways to put a number in front of a decision, on a platform that cannot yet say whether the number is current or which margin it means.
What this choice buys
The roster is set every Monday with the forecast beside capacity, and the view shows when its numbers were loaded. The executive team gets an evidenced recommendation on the assistant, with the disputed margin recorded as a finding rather than discovered in use, and rollout left as the sponsor's separate decision.
When it holds
It holds when the staffing view reads from a source that lands before Monday and not from the pipeline that has run late, and when the evaluation can reach a useful finding without the margin definition. Both assumptions are about sources, and both can be checked before the quarter is committed.
What you accept
- One margin for planning, deferred
- Finance keeps the monthly reconciliation and the footnotes, and if planning starts this quarter it runs on two numbers within a limit the CFO has written down. The staffing view never touches margin. The evaluation does, and its finding is that the assistant cannot answer margin questions until the business agrees on one, which narrows what the executive team imagined.
- Freshness alerts, deferred
- The morning check stays manual, with an owner, a backup and a review of missed mornings after a month, and the check now covers the staffing source. The view shows its load time; what nobody can do is tell the meeting before it opens that the time is wrong.
- The chosen work, once delivered
- A view takes a quarter of Mondays beside the spreadsheet before the spreadsheet goes, and an evaluation set is rerun after every change by someone who knows the domain.
What changes the choice
Replace the staffing view with the freshness alerts if its source turns out to be the pipeline that has run late. Replace the evaluation with the margin work if planning starts this quarter and the sponsor agrees to hold the rollout decision. Either check fits in the first two weeks.